A Clark County District Courtroom choose has dominated in favor of former on line casino magnate Steve Wynn in a lawsuit introduced towards state gaming regulators, who final yr sought to successfully banish Wynn from the business over sexual misconduct allegations.

In an order issued Thursday, Clark County District Courtroom Decide Adriana Escobar wrote that the state’s Gaming Management Board overstepped its regulatory bounds final yr when it filed a proper grievance towards Wynn searching for to ban the previous on line casino government from future involvement within the on line casino business.

Regulators introduced the grievance amid well-documented media experiences and investigations that concluded Wynn made undesirable sexual advances and engaged in inappropriate relationships with subordinates. However Escobar wrote within the order that as a result of Wynn opted to resign from his namesake on line casino firm in 2018 and has no plans to get entangled with a on line casino firm, the Gaming Management Board didn’t have jurisdiction to take motion towards him.

“As a result of Petitioner has no materials involvement, immediately or not directly, with a licensed gaming operation, this Courtroom finds that Respondents don’t have any jurisdiction to impose self-discipline or fines towards Petitioner,” the choose wrote.

Escobar went on to clarify why the Gaming Management Board doesn’t have jurisdiction on this matter.

“Importantly, Respondents fail to assist their place that they’ve jurisdiction over an individual with no intent to be concerned in Nevada’s gaming business sooner or later. Why? There’s none,” the choose wrote. “The truth is, the Fee conceded that Respondents have by no means sought to analyze, self-discipline, or nice an individual that has utterly divested themselves of the gaming business with no intent of returning previous to the Board’s submitting of this underlying grievance.”

The unique grievance, which was filed in October 2019, sought to have Wynn declared formally unsuitable to carry a gaming license, a punishment that included blunt language about his character.

Nevada legislation requires on line casino license candidates to show they’re individuals of “good character, honesty and integrity,” however declaring a person to be “unsuitable” for a gaming license is considerably uncommon. Between 1980 and 2016, the Gaming Fee declared 24 people to be “unsuitable” to function within the state’s playing business, whereas revoking 14 licenses and denying 97 functions from people and companies.

Regulators additionally sought to impose a financial nice towards Wynn personally, together with one based mostly on his refusal to seem at an investigatory listening to. 

The actions towards Wynn got here after the state’s Gaming Fee levied a record-setting $20 million nice towards Wynn Resorts in February 2019, stemming from the corporate’s failure to analyze the sexual misconduct allegations.

The scandal, nonetheless, has left an imprint on the gaming business. Final yr, the Gaming Fee unanimously accredited a regulation that seeks to reinforce protections for business staff towards office harassment or discrimination. The rule requires gaming companies with greater than 15 staff to undertake and implement written procedures prohibiting such exercise.